<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Schmuck &#187; RDFa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoschmuck.com/tag/rdfa/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoschmuck.com</link>
	<description>SEO ideas that work! Search Engine Optimization, Google Optimization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 07:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Enthusiastically ranting about my predictions for SEO in 2010</title>
		<link>http://seoschmuck.com/enthusiastically-ranting-about-my-predictions-for-seo-in-2010</link>
		<comments>http://seoschmuck.com/enthusiastically-ranting-about-my-predictions-for-seo-in-2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emanuel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google/SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caffeine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Social Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microdata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microformats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDFa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoschmuck.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts says,  Expect Caffeine after the holidays
I asked the following question:

Everyone that I talk to is getting tired of SEOs illegitimate ways; SEO websites, SEO links, dodgy footers and all that spam spam spam.
[There is a video that cannot be displayed in this feed. Visit the blog entry to see the video.]
Every developer wants [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://seoschmuck.com/enthusiastically-ranting-about-my-predictions-for-seo-in-2010/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kazaa &#124; Data management project</title>
		<link>http://seoschmuck.com/my-best-seo-tip</link>
		<comments>http://seoschmuck.com/my-best-seo-tip#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google/SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kazaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microformats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDFa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tazwordpress/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RDFa provides a set of XHTML attributes. RDF is stored in triples not RDFa. RDFa is simply a representation of RDF, a syntax for representing RDF triples. Once an RDF vocab is created you can just use it in RDFa, just like existing vocabularies. You still have to create an RDF schema for RDFa for particular data. The argument is usually RDF(a) vs Microformats. Google supprts both and XFN]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://seoschmuck.com/my-best-seo-tip/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
